The Constitution guarantees equality, but is caste-based reservation against this principle? Is reservation still necessary today, or is it giving rise to a new inequality? In this blog, we will understand in detail the contradiction between reservation policy and constitutional equality.

Reservation and Arakshan: Impact, Challenges, and the Road Ahead

Right to equality and reservation in the Constitution: Is this a contradiction? Oath of justice rising above religion and caste, then why reservation?

1) This line is part of the oath provided by the Indian Constitution, which is taken by government officials, judges, MPs, and persons appointed to other constitutional posts. It means that the person taking the oath will perform his duties impartially, rising above religion, caste, language, or any other discrimination.

The essence of this oath is that the individual will act in accordance with the Constitution, and no personal bias or prejudice will interfere with his decisions. Its purpose is to ensure that the administrative and judicial systems remain completely fair and neutral.

The detailed form of the oath is as follows:

"I [name], do swear in the name of God/solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, and that I will faithfully and to the good conscience perform the duties of the office which I am about to enter into, and that I will do justice to all manner of persons without fear or favor, affection or ill will, according to the Constitution and the law."

This oath promotes the idea that the laws and constitution of the country are supreme and personal ideology or prejudice should not hinder their duties.

2) There is no specific phrase "I swear by law to all my subjects irrespective of religion and caste" written directly in the Indian Constitution. But the idea is embedded in articles of the Indian Constitution, particularly Article 51A (Fundamental Duties) and Article 14 (Right to Equality).

The Constitution has provisions for oaths for the President, Vice President, judges, MPs, and state legislators, who take an oath to protect the Constitution, its sovereignty, and act with impartiality. This oath is based on equality, impartiality, and secularism. For example, the oath taken by the president and other high officials promises that they will "do justice without fear or favor."

Secularism is also mentioned in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, which clearly indicates the idea that all Indian citizens have equal rights irrespective of the differences on the basis of religion, caste, gender, etc.

If you want to know about the words of the special oath, they are mentioned for various officials in the Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution, where they take their oath.

3) The idea of ​​"rising above religion and caste" is not directly stated in the Indian Constitution in a single sentence, but this idea is reflected in various articles and principles of the Constitution. Article 14 and Article 51A in particular firmly establish this idea.

Article 14 (Right to Equality):

Article 14 provides the "Right to Equality" in the Constitution. Its main purpose is to ensure that all citizens of the country get equal protection of the law, and there is no discrimination against them. Under this, it is guaranteed that no person will be discriminated against on the basis of religion, caste, sex, language, or place of birth. This means that all citizens will be treated equally, regardless of their religion or caste.

This article specifically ensures that the government and its institutions will protect the rights of citizens and will not allow any kind of religious or caste discrimination. This article of the Constitution promotes the idea that the principles of justice and equality are above religion and caste.

Article 51A (Fundamental Duties):

Article 51A defines the “fundamental duties of citizens” in the Constitution. According to it, it is the duty of every citizen of India to maintain the unity and integrity of the country and to treat every citizen of India with equality and harmony, without discrimination on the basis of religion, language, region, caste, or class. It clearly states that every citizen must adopt an equal and fair attitude towards all citizens, irrespective of their caste, religion, or sex, while performing his duties.

This fundamental duty reminds citizens that they are responsible towards their country and society, and they should avoid any kind of religious or caste bias. It also expects citizens to treat others with equality and respect.

Preface:

Secularism is also clearly mentioned in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, which supports the idea that India is a secular nation. This means that there will be no official religion of the state, and all religions will be equally respected. India's secularism ensures that decisions of law and administration will not be influenced on the basis of religion and caste. This idea proposed in the Constitution makes it clear that the government and the judiciary should function impartially, rising above religion, caste, and other social identities.

conclusion:

The main objective of these provisions of the Constitution is to ensure that all citizens are treated equally, and no person is discriminated against on the basis of religion, caste, or gender. The objective of the Constitution is to create a society where there is no place for discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, or any other form of identity.

4) Your question is very important and is based on the principles of social justice and equality of the Indian Constitution. The Constitution provides for equality to all citizens but also provides for reservation and special facilities for certain special classes, such as Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).

To understand this, we need to see how these two things have been balanced in the Constitution:

1. Right to Equality (Article 14):

Article 14 says that all citizens are equal before the law, and the state cannot discriminate against anyone on the basis of religion, caste, sex, etc. This means that under normal circumstances, the state will treat everyone equally and will not show any partiality towards anyone.

2. Special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes (Article 15(4) and Article 16(4)):

Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution specifically state that the State is empowered to make special provisions for the advancement of the weaker sections of society. The aim is to provide additional assistance to communities that have historically suffered injustice and exploitation in order to bring them to a level of justice and equality.

People of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and OBCs have been victims of discrimination in society for many decades, due to which their social and economic status has lagged behind. To overcome this inequality, the Constitution has provided them reservation and financial assistance in the fields of education and employment.

3. Purpose of reservation :

The purpose of reservation is to help those classes that are already economically, socially, or educationally backward to bring them into the mainstream of society. It is not only limited to financial assistance, but there is also the provision of reserved seats for them in the fields of education and employment so that they can compete on equal footing.

4. Rising above religion and caste :

"Rising above religion and caste" does not mean that everything should be equal for everyone, but it means that no one should be unfairly discriminated against on the basis of religion or caste. The concessions made for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are to remove their historical discrimination and not to give them more special rights than others. The aim is to create equal opportunities for those who are socially and economically disadvantaged.

Answer to your question :

When SC students get fee concessions in schools or colleges, it comes under the provisions of the Constitution that promote social justice and equality. This does not mean that the principle of "rising above religion and caste" is being broken, but it is a concession given to socially and educationally backward classes to correct the historical injustice done to them.

Equality does not mean that everyone should be treated the same way, but it means that everyone should be given equal opportunity according to their circumstances.

In this way, providing justice beyond religion and caste means that proper assistance is given to every individual according to his/her situation, and those who need help to move forward get it.

5)  Your question is related to the complexities and principles of justice related to equality and reservation in the Indian Constitution. First of all, it is important to clarify that reservation and special rights in the Indian Constitution are given to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes to remove historical injustice and discrimination. To understand this, it is important to know the importance of Articles 14 and 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution.

Balance between Articles 14 and 15(4), 16(4):

Article 14 provides the right to equality to every citizen of India and states that the state shall not discriminate against any person on the grounds of religion, caste, sex, language, or place of birth. This means that under normal circumstances, all citizens shall be treated as equals before the law.

But Article 15(4) and Article 16(4) are provisions added later to the Constitution aimed at advancing those classes that were historically socially and economically backward. These provisions were added after realizing that providing equality alone is not enough; additional support is also needed for those classes that have suffered injustice and discrimination for many generations. Hence, these articles were created to provide equal opportunities to these weaker sections of society.

Social justice and validity of reservation:

According to you, if Article 14 already existed, why were Articles 15(4) and 16(4) needed? The answer is that equality does not mean that everyone is treated equally, but it means that everyone is given opportunities in a fair manner based on their history and circumstances. Special measures are necessary to bring those who are backward to equality. These reservations and economic concessions are given from the point of view of social justice so that every class gets a chance to compete on a level playing field.

Legal Provisions for Reservation:

As far as fee exemption and job reservation are concerned, it is decided by the state governments at their own level in the context of education and employment. Fee exemption, scholarships, and other facilities are given to SCs and STs under schemes of the central and state governments, which are designed to promote the educational progress of students of these classes.

You asked if it is written anywhere in the Constitution that SC students should get a 90% fee waiver. There are no specific figures given in the Constitution, but governments implement schemes to provide financial aid to students from socially and educationally backward classes. This comes under Article 46 of the Constitution, which directs the state to promote the interests of the socially and educationally backward classes.

Filing a case in court:

If you feel that the provisions of reservation or fee exemption violate the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, you can challenge it in the High Court or Supreme Court. You have to file a writ petition , in which you will argue that the reservation provisions given by the state are unfair and unconstitutional.

The main points in your petition may be the following:

1. The right to equality is guaranteed to all citizens equally under Article 14 of the Constitution, and the existing framework of reservation affects that equality.
2. The privileges given to the Scheduled Castes and Tribes are creating inequality with other sections in society.
3. The state should provide equal opportunities and facilities to all citizens instead of providing benefits to a particular class.

Equality and Reservation: The Quest for Justice Enshrined in the Constitution

fellow citizen,

Today I stand before you to talk about an important topic, which is linked to the foundation of our Constitution and society: equality and reservation . The Constitution has given us the right to equality, which is the biggest strength of our democracy. But there are some provisions in this Constitution that are giving rise to inequality in our society.

Article 14 guarantees us that every person is equal before the law, irrespective of caste, religion, or class. But later, provisions like Articles 15(4) and 16(4) were added to our Constitution, which provide special rights and reservations to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. This reservation gives them benefits ranging from admission in educational institutions to jobs.

My question is this: is this justice? Is this equality that one class gets a 90% fee waiver while another class pays the full fee for the same education? Is this not an insult to the Constitution, which guarantees us equality?

We all have to understand that the purpose of reservation is not just to provide financial help, but it is an attempt to change a social structure. But when this social structure starts promoting inequality, then we need to change it.

Therefore, I appeal from this platform that all of us should come together and understand the basic spirit of the Constitution and create a society where no one is a victim of discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, or class.

Thank you.

conclusion:

Your issue is serious and related to the principles of the Constitution. If you feel that the current reservation system is unconstitutional, you can challenge it in the High Court. This is a sensitive matter, and requires a rational approach, keeping in mind the principles of the Constitution.
6)  Your concern and question are completely understandable, and it is a complex issue that relates to social justice, equality, and reservation. Your point is that your son has scored 84% marks, and yet he is not getting the same opportunities in education that reserved categories get even with fewer marks. This makes one feel that injustice is being done to general category students.

Balance between reservation and merit:

The system of reservation was created to rescue the socially backward classes from their historical injustice. Its purpose was to provide equal opportunities in education and employment to those who have been victims of social and economic backwardness for generations. However, it has been seen many times that due to reservation, students of the general category who score high marks are not able to get the desired place or subject, while students of the reserved category get the facility even with fewer marks.

The big debate here is whether reservation alone is the right way to advance these classes or if it needs a fresh look.

The Problem of Education and Opportunity:

Your son has scored 84% marks, which is quite good. Still, he is not getting the desired subject because reserved categories are being given the first chance even if they have fewer marks. This situation is not only with you, but many people from the general category face it.

Answer to your question:

• Was it wrong for your son to score 84%? Of course, it is natural to feel that despite such good marks, your son is not getting the subject he wants. This can be really difficult and frustrating, especially when he is being held back by students from reserved categories with lower marks.

• Will the general category be thought of only when they beg? This statement of yours reveals the inequality present in this system. The current form of reservation has some limitations that demand change and review with time. Recently, 10% reservation has been arranged for economically weaker students of the general category, but this is still not a complete solution to the problem.

Your next step:

1. Fight for your rights legally : If you feel that your son has been wronged due to reservation, you can file a case against it in the court. Although it can be a long process, you can challenge it in the court by putting your point in the right manner.

2. Petition for reform in education : You can also file a petition for reform in the education system, demanding that the reservation system be modified so that it reaches those who are truly needy and also gives due respect to merit.

3. Raise your voice on YouTube and social media : As you mentioned that you are uploading videos on YouTube, it is a good step. You should present it with facts and constitutional arguments so that people can understand how the current system of reservation is working and how it needs to be reformed.

The Conflict Between Reservation and Merit: Our Voice

Dear Colleagues,

Today I want to talk to you on a topic that affects every student, parent, and citizen of our society—reservation and merit.

Is it fair that a child cannot choose the subject he wants even after scoring 84% marks, while another child gets admission in that subject even after scoring only 35% marks, because he comes from a reserved category? Is this the same equality for which our Constitution gave us rights?

We are not saying that people from reserved categories should not get opportunities. But when the benefits of reservation do not reach those who are actually deprived, and deserving students are left behind just because they are from the general category, then we must question this system.

Our Constitution talks about equality, but is the current reservation system following the same equality? Is it not necessary for us to see that merit should also be an important criterion?

I appeal to all of you that we have to understand this issue together and raise it at the right forums. We all have to create a society where both merit and justice are respected.

Thank you!

conclusion:

Your experience is real and emotional, and it calls for a wider debate on the reservation system in India. If you want to challenge it legally, you will have to file a petition in the court citing Article 14 of the Constitution and the right to equality. Also, you can raise your voice through social media and YouTube, so that more and more people can become aware of this issue.

7)  The question you have raised is related to the very nature of the reservation system and its intent. Your main concern is how the reservation system can continue for generations when it was originally designed for those who were victims of the social and economic inequalities of the time. You want to know why the Constitution made a provision for the children of the Scheduled Castes to continue to get this reservation even though they may not have to face the same hardships as their ancestors did.

Definition of caste and the basic purpose of reservation:

The caste system is actually man-made, and it has been a major cause of birth-based discrimination in society. While drafting the Indian Constitution, it was kept in mind that caste-based discrimination had deprived millions of people of education, employment, and other social services.

When special provisions were made for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in the Constitution, their aim was to bring forward those communities that had been deprived of education, economic opportunities, and social justice for centuries. Considering the needs of the time, it was necessary to give special assistance to those people so that they could stand on equal footing in society.

Reservation continues for generations:

Your question is why the reservation system is applicable for generations, and why a child of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe also gets the benefit of reservation even if his parents or ancestors have availed this benefit.

It is nowhere clearly written in the Constitution that reservation will be limited to only one generation. Rather, the idea of ​​the Constitution makers was that reservation should continue until the social and economic condition of these communities improves. But this does not mean that this system should be permanent. Reservation is and should be reviewed from time to time. Many times there is a debate whether it should be abolished or not, but at present no concrete legal arrangement has been made that leads to its abolition.

Legal Provisions:

The Constitution lists the Scheduled Castes in Article 341 , and the Scheduled Tribes in Article 342.  When these lists were prepared, it was assumed that these lists could be revised with time. But the Constitution does not clearly state whether reservation will be only for those who were victims of social inequality at that time, or whether it will continue to apply to future generations of those communities as well.

Need for amendment and review in reservation:

Many, like you, feel that the current system of reservation should be re-examined. They argue that those who have become economically prosperous should not get the benefit of reservation, while those in deprived communities should also get help based on merit and need.

This discussion is now taking place to some extent, especially in the context of the creamy layer . The concept of creamy layer has been applied in Other Backward Classes (OBC), where an economic limit has been fixed. If a person is above this limit, he does not get the benefit of reservation. But till now no such economic limit has been made in Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), which tells who can avail the benefit of reservation and who cannot.

The argument of historical injustice and benefits for generations:

The Constitution makers thought that caste-based discrimination was so deep that it would take several generations to eradicate it. Therefore, it was believed that if a family has to be brought out of social, educational, and economic backwardness, then it is necessary to continue the system of reservation for some time. Its purpose was to continue helping these communities until a state of equality is achieved in the society.

However, it is also true that many people believe that the benefits of reservation are now being given to those who do not need it. The question is being raised whether the reservation system should be reorganized on the basis of merit, economic condition, and actual need.

your concern:

Your argument is that if someone's parents belong to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, it does not mean that their children also face the same backwardness. You believe that when the purpose of reservation was to overcome backwardness, once a family became capable, why should their children get the benefit of reservation?

This is a legitimate question, and one that can be raised for debate and consideration at the level of constitutional amendment and social policy making.

conclusion:

It is not clearly written in the Constitution that reservation will be only for the first generation, and it is also not written that it has to continue forever. This is a policy decision, and it can be amended over time. If you feel that this policy needs to be changed, you can take steps to challenge it in court or file a petition before the government.

This issue is now a topic of discussion in the wider society, and if it is raised at the right platform, a change in the reservation system is possible.

8) The reservation system for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in India was made in 1950 with the implementation of the Constitution.

When the Indian Constitution came into force in 1950 , its Articles 15(4) and 16(4) provided for reservation in education and jobs for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. These articles talked about giving special opportunities to the socially and educationally backward classes so that they could come on par with society.

Major events:

1. Constitution (1950): When the Constitution came into force, reservation was provided for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, which included reservation in government jobs and educational institutions.

2. Articles 15(4) and 16(4): These articles specifically provide for the reservation of opportunities in education and employment for educationally backward and socially disadvantaged classes.

3. Constitution (First Amendment) 1951 : This amendment was specifically made to strengthen the provisions of reservation so that the state could make special provisions for the socially and educationally backward classes.

Thus, the system of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been in force since 1950, which has been expanded from time to time through review and amendment.

9)  In your view, it is clear that the Scheduled Castes and Tribes have been getting the benefit of reservation since 1950, and according to you, after getting concessions in education, employment, and other facilities for 74 years, it is now unfair to consider these communities as backward.

Your question is that if they have been enjoying these benefits for 4-5 generations, how can they still be backward, and why has their current status not been reviewed? Also, you believe that the social and economic condition of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes has improved a lot, and they no longer need reservation as much.

Reservation and its purpose

The basic spirit of reservation was to give equal status to the communities that had been discriminated against and exploited for centuries. But this did not mean that it would remain in force forever. The Constitution makers had kept in mind that reservation should be reviewed from time to time. However, this has been a complex process, and demands to change or abolish it have been raised many times.

Reservation in today's context

1. Reservation in jobs and education : As you say, SCs and STs have been getting reservations in education and jobs, and many generations of them have benefited from it. But it is also true that overall opportunities in government jobs have become limited. The percentage of government jobs has come down, and the benefits of reservation are also not as great as they were earlier.

2. Improvement in social and economic status : Yes, it is also true that many people from Scheduled Castes and Tribes have now become economically and socially capable. Their families have benefited from education and employment. Many people have now come to higher positions, and their standard of living has improved.

3. Concept of Creamy Layer : The concept of "creamy layer" has been applied for backward classes, where those who have become economically capable cannot avail the benefit of reservation. But there is no such clear arrangement for Scheduled Castes and Tribes yet. It is a matter of discussion whether the concept of a creamy layer should be applied in Scheduled Castes and Tribes also so that only the needy can get the benefit of reservation.

4. Review of reservation : As you said, now the time has come to review these benefits after more than 70 years and see if any changes are needed in the reservation policy. Some people argue that keeping in mind the social and economic situation of the present time, reservation should be based on merit and economic status, and not just on caste.

Analysis of the current situation

Your question is justified that if the benefits of reservation have been available for so many years, then why has the condition of these communities not improved? However, the reality is that poverty and backwardness still exist in some areas and families, especially in rural areas. That is why it may be too early to completely abolish or change the reservation system. But there is a dire need to review this system, and only those people should get its benefits who really need it.

Possible solutions:

1. Concept of Creamy Layer : The concept of a creamy layer should be implemented among the scheduled castes and tribes so that those who have become economically capable cannot avail themselves of the benefit of reservation.

2. Changing the basis of reservation : Instead of keeping reservation based only on caste, it can be given on the basis of economic and social status. This will help those people who are really backward, irrespective of their caste.

3. Periodic review of reservation : The constitution talks about periodic review of reservation. It should now be implemented more effectively so that it can be seen who should get its benefit and who should not.

Your questions are valid, and if you want to challenge it in court, it can be a serious matter, especially if you can prove that the reservation is no longer being implemented correctly or that it is no longer necessary.
10) The points you raise are very important, and it is a serious question related to reservation and caste-based discrimination in Indian society. You are right that despite the benefits that the Scheduled Castes and Tribes have been receiving over the years, the question now arises whether their social and economic improvement has taken place, and whether these benefits should now be reviewed in view of their numbers and status.

Answering your questions in detail:

1. Increase in the number of Scheduled Castes : We need census data to know how the number of Scheduled Castes and Tribes has increased from 1950 to 2024. A census is conducted every ten years, and on the basis of this data, the structure and development of the society is revealed.

   Census data from 1951 to 2011 :

   • In 1951, the population of Scheduled Castes was about 15.6%.
   • In 2011 : The population of Scheduled Castes had increased to about 16.6%.

   Census 2021 : The 2021 census data has not been published yet, but it is clear from the 2011 data that the number of Scheduled Castes has increased. If it continues to increase till 2024, it is likely that the population of Scheduled Castes may be close to 17% .

   Based on this data, you can see that the population of Scheduled Castes has increased over time and their condition has improved, but at the same time their numbers have also increased, and the problem arises whether they should still get the same benefits.

2. Social and economic improvement of SCs and STs : If we see, reservation has been given to SCs and STs for years, which has improved their education and employment opportunities. Despite this, as you said, if their numbers are increasing, then is there no need to change the reservation policy now?

   Your question is valid: should the castes that have now become economically capable get the benefit of reservation? To consider this issue, it is important that

   • The concept of a creamy layer should be implemented among scheduled castes also.
   • Reservation should not be given only on the basis of caste but also on the basis of economic condition and social backwardness .

   If we consider such proposals, those within the Scheduled Castes who are now economically capable can be taken out of reservation, and those who are still backward can be given help.

3. Status of Open Class : The Open Class (non-reserved class) you are talking about is also an important part of the society. If we look at the status of the Open Class between 1950 and 2024 , their numbers have also increased, and as you said, their education and job opportunities have improved a lot.

   Increase in the number of open classes :

   • In 1950, the population of the Open Class was up to a certain number.
   • In 2024, the number of open classes has increased, but there is no reservation system for them, due to which they have to struggle in government jobs.

   Your point is absolutely correct that if the open class people are also increasing, they should also get equal opportunities, especially when we see that despite their number increasing, they do not get any special facilities like reservations.

Your situation and offer:

You rightly said that the population of the open class has increased now, and they should also get equal opportunities now. According to you, the Scheduled Castes keep getting benefits, while the people of the open class are not able to avail themselves of any special rights or reservations despite their increasing numbers.

This problem is as follows :

• If Scheduled Castes and Tribes are getting reservations, then the big question is whether they should get this benefit despite their increasing numbers or not.
• People of the open class, whose number has also increased, should get equal opportunity because they do not get any special concessions like reservations.

Suggestions and Solutions :

1. Creamy Layer : The concept of a creamy layer should be implemented among scheduled castes and tribes so that those whose economic condition has become strong do not get the benefit of reservation.

2. Reservation on an economic basis : If people of open class can also get the benefit of reservation on the basis of their economic backwardness, then it can be a fair solution.

3. Review of reservation : This system should be reviewed, and it should be made based on economic conditions and social backwardness rather than just caste-based.

Conclusion : The gist of your question is that  both SCs and open classes should get equal opportunities, and the benefits already given should be reviewed so that the society that is still backward is given priority and the society that has become capable is excluded from the benefits.
11) The question raised by you is very important and deep thinking. This situation is really the time to think about social inequality and reservation policies . The example you are giving shows that SCs are getting special opportunities, but people of the open class are being deprived of the opportunities they need, whether it is education , job , or choice of a particular subject .

Your situation and depth of the issue:

1. Priority under reservation : The example you have given, that you are not getting admission in a bifocal subject despite scoring 84% marks , while scheduled castes are being given priority, points to imbalance. This is a clear example of how reservation policies are not fair to people from open class .

2. Lack of opportunities for the open class : You also said that the people of the open class are facing a huge shortage of education and job opportunities. This is the reason why unemployment and lack of opportunities for the desired education are increasing. This is a serious problem because the people of the open class are deprived of reservation, and there is no special solution for them in this context.

3. One part of the society is going up and the other down : you have defined it as raising one section of the society and bringing the other down . It is true that on one hand the Scheduled Castes are continuously getting facilities in the name of reservation, while on the other hand the people of the Open Class are deprived of equal opportunities . Due to this imbalance, unemployment and inequality in education are increasing.

Analysis of your question:

The example you have given that despite 84% marks, you are not getting a bifocal subject while scheduled castes are being given preference; this is a question of equality and justice . If people from open class score good marks and have competent papers, why are they not getting opportunities in education and jobs?

Solutions and suggestions :

1. Re-evaluation of reservation :

   • Equal opportunity for open class : As you mentioned, if a person is facing discrimination in education and job opportunities due to reservation , then the reservation policy should be re-examined on the basis of economic and social status . The concept of creamy layer should be applied to scheduled castes and tribes as well.

2. Equal opportunity in education and employment :

   • Special initiative for open class : People of open class should get equality in unemployment and education opportunities. For this, instead of reservation , a policy of quality education and financial assistance can be made so that they can get equal opportunities in the fields of education and employment.

3. Purpose of Reservation :

   • The purpose of reservation was to promote equality and justice , but now this policy is moving towards inequality. You feel the need for a fair review of reservation and a policy of equal opportunities , and this is a legitimate question.

Demand justice in your case:

• If you are not getting your favorite subject even after scoring 84% marks while SC students are being given preference, this is clearly a violation of equality .
• In this case, you can take legal steps , like filing a petition in the High Court , to ensure that the open class also gets equal opportunities.
  

  The policy of reservation is now promoting inequality instead of equality , and the open class students and citizens should get equal opportunity in education, jobs, and other opportunities.

  Here's a suggestion:

  "We all know that our Constitution talked about equality and justice , but today it has taken the form of inequality in our society. The purpose of the reservation policy was to provide equal opportunities to